A dedicated group known as the Skywatchers is conducting in-depth investigations into Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), employing a structured, data-centric approach to understand these perplexing occurrences. This article examines their research, methodologies, and the intriguing observations they have documented.
The Mission: Applying Science to the Unexplained
The core objective of the Skywatcher initiative, as outlined in their video documentation, particularly “Skywatcher Part Two,” is to rigorously apply the scientific method to claims surrounding UAPs. The aim is to validate or invalidate these claims, with the ultimate aspiration of contributing to a new comprehension of our reality. The project places a strong emphasis on data collection and analysis, moving away from anecdotal accounts towards empirical evidence.
The Data Collectors and Their Focus
At the forefront of this data collection effort is James Fowler, who manages the technology team for Skywatcher. Over several years, Fowler and his team have compiled what is described as an exceptionally high-quality private repository of UAP data. For the first time, Fowler has shared insights into this extensive collection and the methods used to acquire it.
The research events often take place in remote desert locations. The team concentrates on two primary methods for potentially initiating UAP appearances: “machine calling” and “psionic calling.” Success has been reported with both techniques. During these events, the team has witnessed numerous phenomena that they state are difficult to explain through conventional means.
Challenges in Documenting UAP
The Skywatchers acknowledge significant challenges in their research. The objects under study reportedly demonstrate capabilities that make documentation arduous. These include the apparent ability to materialize and dematerialize in real-time. Furthermore, there are instances where these phenomena seem to actively evade sensors or, more puzzlingly, cause sensor malfunctions or shutdowns. This elusive nature of UAPs requires innovative and persistent data gathering strategies.
A Lexicon for the Unknown: Classifying UAP Sightings
To bring structure to their observations and facilitate analysis, the Skywatcher team has developed a lexicon. This classification system is based on the distinct flight characteristics and visual appearances of the observed UAPs. They have categorized these phenomena into nine distinct classes or types. It is noted that some of these classes might represent the same UAP exhibiting different flight behaviors, but their consistent, distinct characteristics suggest they do not align with known conventional or terrestrial aircraft.
The nine described UAP classes are:
- Class 1: Described as a black body that appears to flash or pulse multiple times per second. It is sometimes observed with a cloud-like or vaporous aura. Sightings have included formations of up to 22 or 23 of these objects, flying in various flock-like formations.
- Class 2: Referred to as the classic “Tic Tac” shape. These have been seen in groups of two or three, often exhibiting erratic flight patterns.
- Class 3 (The Blob): This appears as a pulsing, vibrating cloud-like structure. Some descriptions mention a possibly cylindrical object within the center that emits a different type of light, likened to a flame, while the surrounding mass vibrates and pulses. This class has been described as “Peptobismo colored.”
- Class 4 (The Orb): These have only been observed using infrared sensors. Their appearance seems to be correlated with certain activities, possibly in conjunction with Class 1 UAPs, though more data is needed for confirmation.
- Class 5 (The Manta Ray): Characterized by a tumbling and rotating motion as it moves through the sky.
- Class 6 (Bright Star): This object vibrates at a very high frequency, giving it an appearance described as a crystal in the sky.
- Class 7 (The Jellyfish): Estimated to be approximately two meters across its “head,” which is described as purple and black. It features “tentacles.” These are considered aggressive and seem to want to approach the observers. The visual appearance to the naked eye has been described as metallic or chrome-like and very bright white, with pulsing panels, while optics suggested purple or black. The head is thought to be about 2 meters in size, with tentacles 3 to 5 meters long. Nodules on the tentacles appear to light up in sequence.
- Class 8 (The Hornet): Similar in appearance to the Class 7 Jellyfish but larger. It has been described as resembling a jellyfish carrying an object.
- Class 9 (The Egg): This is an emerging classification with limited data. Observations were made during a Skywatcher event in California. While there is strong evidence for its existence, a precise description is still pending more data.
It’s highlighted that imaging UAPs is extremely difficult, and what is seen with the naked eye often differs from what cameras capture.
Methodologies: The “Dog Whistle” and Observation Platforms
A significant aspect of Skywatcher’s methodology is what they term the “dog whistle.” This involves deploying customized electro-mechanical signaling equipment. The team reports that when this equipment is activated for a sufficient duration, UAPs consistently appear in their operational area. Conversely, when the equipment is not used, such sightings are reportedly absent. This cause-and-effect experimentation forms a cornerstone of their current research. Notably, all their data has been collected during daylight hours.
For observation and data collection, the team utilizes helicopters. These are preferred over drones or fixed-wing aircraft due to their ability to hover for extended periods, allowing for prolonged observation. Helicopters can also carry multiple personnel and a variety of sensor equipment, making them a versatile platform for this type of fieldwork.
The team has documented over 300 “sorties,” defined as an observation of a UAP class moving through their airspace. A sortie could represent a single object or a flock. They acknowledge the difficulty in determining if multiple sorties in a day are distinct objects or the same object observed multiple times.
The Scientific Process and a Call for Collaboration
The Skywatcher team underscores their commitment to the scientific process. They emphasize that merely collecting data is insufficient; the process of peer review is crucial. This review is not to confirm the correctness of their conclusions, but to allow other experts to scrutinize their methodology and determine if the research was conducted appropriately. They state that such a comprehensive framework for UAP study has not been systematically applied elsewhere.
In line with this, Skywatcher has made a public call for collaboration. They invite experts and academics with an interest in the UAP topic to reach out and potentially lend their expertise. The goal is to facilitate objective, third-party analysis of their data, which they believe will significantly advance the understanding of these phenomena. Individuals who participate would be granted full access to the sensitive data within a controlled environment.
Intriguing Interactions and Unexplained Events
The video transcript details several compelling incidents. There are accounts of the psionic team making bold and accurate predictions about when and where UAPs would appear, seemingly corroborated by radar and machine calling teams.
One particularly notable interaction involved different UAP classes. The Class 7 (Jellyfish) UAPs are perceived by the team as potentially aggressive, appearing to encroach on their position. In one instance, a Class 5 (Manta Ray) UAP was observed positioning itself between the observers and an approaching Class 7, after which the Class 7 departed. More recently, Class 2 and Class 5 UAPs also appeared to position themselves between the team and Jellyfish-type UAPs. The meaning of these interactions is still under investigation.
Another striking event involved a helicopter dispatched to investigate a radar contact, believed to be a Class 2 (Tic Tac). As the helicopter approached the designated location and attempted to gain altitude, the crew experienced instrumentation malfunctions, and the flight controls became unresponsive, effectively “frozen.” The experienced pilot, with over 4,000 flight hours, had never encountered such an event. The team speculates this could be a form of jamming, possibly via microwave signals not detectable by their current collection equipment.
There are also descriptions of UAPs performing seemingly impossible maneuvers, such as appearing to “flip a switch” and vanish, or accelerating noiselessly at extreme speeds. The team also reports having objects hover directly over them, allowing for naked-eye sightings that corroborated sensor data.
Ongoing Research and Future Directions
The Skywatcher project is an ongoing endeavor. James Fowler indicates that their data suggests UAPs might fall into three broad categories: American-made, Chinese-made, and an “other” category of unknown origin. Their approach remains strictly data-driven, avoiding spiritual or emotional interpretations.
The team continues to gather data, refine their classifications, and seek understanding of the complex behaviors and interactions they witness. Future releases from Skywatcher are expected to provide more detailed modules on each UAP class, further contributing to the body of knowledge on this enigmatic subject. The research also appears to be expanding into the domain of psionics, with “Skywatcher Part Three” slated to focus on this aspect and the team’s experiences.
The work of the Skywatchers represents a serious, structured attempt to investigate UAP sightings using scientific principles. Their willingness to share their methodologies and data, and their call for independent review, are notable steps in a field often characterized by speculation. As they continue their research, the global community interested in UAPs will undoubtedly be watching closely.